BUILT FOR / LAW FIRMS

Automation & AI for Small Law Firms in Texas

Intake is the leak, and it is usually invisible.

The consultation you never heard about.

In a small firm the intake call arrives while everyone is in court, at a deposition, or heads-down on a filing. The caller does not leave a message, and there is no record it ever happened, so the leak never appears in any report. This page describes the shape of that problem honestly: LANDA has built this kind of system inside businesses it runs, and is looking for its first firms to build it with.

Where a matter is usually lost.

  1. 01

    A potential client calls during a hearing. Nobody answers, they do not leave a message, and they call the next firm on the page.

  2. 02

    The consultation is booked, the conflict check has not happened yet, and nobody notices until the meeting.

  3. 03

    The matter opens and the same client details get retyped into three different places.

What that turns into.

Intake that happens when you cannot

The call is answered, the matter type, the other party's name and the urgency are captured, and it reaches you as something you can act on.

The conflict check before the meeting

The names that need checking are surfaced at intake rather than discovered in the room.

Details typed once

Client and matter information moves between intake, the calendar and your practice system instead of being rekeyed.

Why the trade matters here.

Two things constrain this work and both are taken seriously here. Nothing built for a firm gives legal advice or speaks for a lawyer, and anything touching client information is designed around confidentiality from the first conversation rather than retrofitted afterwards.

Services behind this work.

Questions law firms ask.

Will it give legal advice to a caller?

No. It takes details and books time. It does not answer a legal question, estimate a case, or say anything that could be relied on. That line is not negotiable and it is built in, not a setting.

What about confidentiality?

Scope is decided before anything is built: what is captured, where it goes, who can see it, and what is deliberately not collected. A firm that cannot answer those questions about its own tools has a problem regardless of who built them.

Does this replace our practice management software?

No. Clio, Lawmatics and the rest do the matter work. The gap is usually before that, at intake, and between systems that do not talk to each other.

Houston-based. Working across Texas.